Story of the year
Initiated by: Tamohara Investment Managers
Dear Investor,
For those who may be reading my year-end letter for the first time, I have a tradition of reflecting, and picking a story from the year gone by.
As I state every time, most of the “news” is not structural and not indicative of a seismic shift, but merely following a cycle. On March 31st 2019, I wrote:
“Narratives and stories drive investment outcomes in the
short run. For the most part, they provide us with shock
therapies with complete elasticity. The effect of the story is
felt temporarily and over a period of time we are back to
business as usual. Yet there are few stories that alter the
course of business and cause a structural shift. As an investor
with the intent of long term wealth creation, we need to
ignore the stories with elasticity as noise and focus only on
those few that create a change bringing about a new or an
enlarged addressable opportunity.
“
From the indigenisation of pharma and chemical supply
chains in 2019 to energy sovereignty in 2023 and claiming a
renaissance of European manufacturing that would no longer
wish to rely on America in 2025, this exercise has ended up
sparking a lot of ideas for us. Going through the news cycle for
the past year should be no different.
What happened in FY26?
Headlines in FY26 were far too temperamental, spoiling the
quality of sleep for us all. One man, more than anyone else,
dominated the news throughout- President Trump. While they
weren’t narrow in variety like the last year’s, they certainly were
narrow in the source from where they came from.
Wars
With the withdrawal of American troops from Afghanistan by
the previous President, one would have assumed that we
would be insulated from an American Presidency inflicting a
major global conflict upon us for a while. It was too short a
time. It would be amiss to speak of the story of the year and not start with the Iran-Israel-US
conflict we find ourselves in today. On one side we have Israel
and the US, who seem to be playing to their previously
practiced playbook of hit first and hit hard. The other side, Iran,
however seems to be referring to a playbook we haven’t seen in
the 21st century. Attacking fellow Muslim nations in the region
during the holy month of Ramdan, fighting with a spirit of that
wounded lion who has nothing to lose. Their guerilla tactics
coupled with a surprising dose of ‘kar le jo karna hai’ (do what
you may please) in their approach to attacking neighboring
states is akin to multiple hardworking ants at play with a
hammer (USA) trying to chase them all. The hammer may or
may not get the ant before it scurries, but it certainly damages
the floor badly in doing so.
The closure of the Strait of Hormuz speaks again to every
nation’s need to build supply chain sovereignty or at least
antifragility as much as possible. To the rest of the world, the
war has simply underlined what was learnt in the aftermath of
the pandemic, energy sovereignty and domestication of all
critical supply chains. Be it our calibration of energy sources
since (see chart below) or incentivising higher indigenous
content either via PLI, BIS norms or simply mandating it so,
India has clearly already adopted this lesson. The shifts caused
by this war are therefore furthering an existing trend.
Source: Zerodha
Our tryst with conflict wasn’t limited to international conflicts
alone this year. Operation Sindoor in response to the cowardly
terrorist attack in Pahalgam in April redrew the contours of war
between India and Pakistan. Use of Air force, which would have
been once considered escalatory has now been normalised as a
result of this operation. The advent of a new era of weapons
systems- drones paired with multiple long range missiles
capable of precision targeting is the norm. While Sindoor
highlighted to the world the military asymmetry between India
and Pakistan, for Indian businesses it highlighted the
robustness of our defenses, and the shift in attitude of the
current regime.
Tariff tantrums
When President Trump was not busy orchestrating global
politics, he single handedly raised over $150bn (and counting) in
tariff revenues for the USA. The uncertainty this brought upon
exporters was severe. A container at sea could face significantly
different economics for the customer who may choose to
simply not accept the shipment at that point. Exports stalled as
a result. Once a deal was reached, businesses took the new cost
structure in their stride. A numerical shift, but not a structural
shift barring the localisation of supply chains we have seen
previously.
The disregard of the mighty
The eccentricities of President Trump (and many others)
showed up in the expanded release of Epstein files. How
quickly the news cycle moved on from it, how quickly everyone
was able to go back to their lives with minimal damage or
consequences shows the power of the mighty.
This blatant disregard for rules by the mighty traveled home
when the largest airline operator in the country brought our
flights to standstill. In failure to adhere to the new DGCA norms
for flight crew time (notifications for which were given over a
year prior to implementation). 4500 flights were cancelled in a
span of 10 days. A 22.2 crore fine solved it all.
This has however been the way of the world. The world bends to the mighty.
Return of Bollywood and Renaissance of Virat Kohli
And to the mighty Dhurandhar, the world finally gave in. The
fervor to watch the 4hour+ second installment of the movie
was difficult to miss in any part of the country, in any part of
life- office, walks in children parks (by parents ofcourse), house
parties. Everyone wondered who is bade sahaab, and both
Dhurandhar 1 and 2 and brought people back into cinema halls
in throes. Perhaps our love affair with movies is reignited.
Perhaps our love affair with Virat Kohli needed the poetic 2025
he has had. Retirement from the test format that no one saw
coming and a RCB victory in IPL that everyone has hoped for at
some point.
Our love for Bollywood and cricket has never been one to shift.
Though it seems to have compounded brilliantly in the
culmination of the sale of RCB for $1.78bn to the Aditya Birla
Group.
Structural agents of change
The above headlines, while significant, aren't the harbingers of
change that we look for. While the power of the Indian agent
was unleashed in our imagination with Dhurandhar, the agent
that is one for a structural change, is Claude. Agentic AI has
leveled the playing field. Access to capital and tech/ best
processes was limited to the ones at the top. Depth in private
and venture markets had already been solved for the former.
Agentic AI solved the latter. For this reason alone we pick it to
be our story of the year!
In our industry itself, data updation in models collating notes
from years on a business and creating a summarized research
document on the company, being alerted on when an idea
could potentially fit into your framework, scheduling meetings
effectively, providing notes prior to those meetings (making
them far more productive), etc. are some of the capabilities the
“agent” has brought in. It has therefore resulted in a shift in the
education qualifications required (none). Critical thinking takes
precedence vs. having someone follow instructions. Perhaps so
does liberal arts over professional degrees.
For smaller enterprises, the agent frees up bandwidth of
executive assistants to see if they would morph into a
founder’s office role. Technology is not intimidating and is
democratized.
The conversation shifts to growth from what are the limits and
challenges to growth. Perhaps the era of proliferation of
professional and quality SMEs is here upon us. This is the
structural shift we are calling out for this FY.
As always, we thank you for putting your faith in us. Wish you a very happy and prosperous FY27!
Best,
Harini Dedhia